Ah, I really need to catch up on posting my reading challenge reviews before starting to read yet another book… So, as a starter, a review of a book turning out to be not as good as I had expected it to be.
“Cities in Flight” by James Blish is a tetralogy written between 1950 and 1962. As the foreword tells, the whole story began as a short story in a pulp magazine. This went on to become book 3 of the series. Blish then added books 1, 4 and 2 to expand on the story and add some background information. The basic plot outline is that science has advanced to the point where life prolonging pills are a reality and long distance space flight has become possible by encapsulating cities like New York in so-called spindizzy-fields and moving them out to space. Mankind has settled distant planets and the cities move from planet to planet in search of work because there are no resources left on Earth. The underlying theme is the “decline of the Western culture”, an inspiration Blish received from a book by historian Oswald Spengler. (How glad I was that the afterword gave an explanation of this…)
I had set out reading the book expecting it to be some sort of “space opera” – and was somewhat disappointed finding the first book to be pretty science-oriented. It is set in the future of 2018 and tells of the development of the “anti-agathics”, the drugs that suppress the aging process. A second line of action gives an account of a science experiment in the atmosphere of Jupiter, although the main argument of the story is that the cultural development of the West has stalled and scientific development is no longer supported by the government.
The second book tells of a more distant future, and here the story turned more into what I had expected. It focusses on an adolescent, Chris deFord, who accidentally joins a town leaving for a life amongst the stars. Following his transfer to another migrant city, New York, the reader is introduced to the whole set-up of the travelling cities (or Okies, a reference to migrant workers from Oklahoma in the 1930s looking for work in California), how they are governed by a mayor who has the City Fathers, a computer, at his disposal for reference and decision-making, how the cities need to travel from planet to planet to dig for resources, and the underlying “code of honour” of the cities.
The third book takes another step into the future. The story is centered on the Okie city of New York and the main protagonists are the mayor John Amalfi and the city manager Mark Hazleton. When they find a planet travelling far from any star and with an undeveloped society, they encounter a number of problems but are able to solve them all. They help the planet out with their spindizzy-technology. After putting the planet on a new trajectory, New York encounters a conglomeration of other migrant cities and they learn that the universal currency has been devalued. The end of the story takes New York to another galaxy and leaves it stranded on a planet that is named New Earth.
The fourth book sees New York still on New Earth, but mayor Amalfi seems to be determined to raise the city up again. At that moment, the travelling planet from the previous book makes an entrance again with a technologically advanced society living on it (all thanks to the spindizzies received from New York). The society is in fact so advanced, they have found a rift in the fabric of space meaning the end of time – in our and a parallel universe – is near. The question is, what will happen and will any of the protagonists make the transition?
So, what is it that I liked and disliked about the book? I really liked the story idea of the migrant cities. But I have the feeling that Blish did not think the concept of them 100 % through – for the first story written, the concept was good enough but fitting in the other stories seemed to be something of a struggle (and I think Blish was aware of that while writing some of the later books). Sometimes it seems as though there are only around 50-100 people in the Okie cities, at other times it sounds closer to a couple of thousands. But there never is a mention of what those people are occupied with during the time they are spending travelling through space. This makes the stories somewhat lifeless. The temporal dimensions are also far too vague for my liking. After the initial scientific breakthrough in 2018, it takes another 1000 years of meager scientific progress to advance space flight to the point where long distance flight is possible. And then the rest of the storyline seems to be cramped into just several hundreds of years with time literally running out in the end. What I can accept though is that the portrayal of computer output is – compared to our reality of today – pretty limited (well, who could have predicted that rapid development in the 1950s?).
But my main struggle throughout the most part (starting in book 2, and including all of books 3 and 4) was that I could not connect to the character of John Amalfi. It is not that I disliked him. The problem was, there was neither much to like nor to dislike about him. Maybe the one thing about this character that made me sigh from time to time was his tendency to withhold information on his plans to solve the next problem arising.
The best book to me was the second one because I felt a link to Chris deFord, going with him through the learning process and becoming acquainted with the whole concept of the migrant cities. The development of Blish’s writing ability are apparent here (as it was the last book of the tetralogy written).
To sum it up: should you be a die-hard science fiction fan with a particular interest in the 1950s, consider reading “Cities in Flight” – you will enjoy the basic idea behind the migrant cities. If you are not a die-hard science fiction fan, consider picking something else to read, there are plenty of books out there with more intriguing character developments.